
Tennessee
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.0%Tennessee
51.0%Auburn
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -0.2
PROJECTED TOTAL158.3
MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -104

Auburn
21-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTennessee 79
Projected Total158.3
Projected ScoreAuburn 79
Team Comparison
68.6MMH Power Index64.4
115.8Offensive Efficiency118.8
102.1Defensive Efficiency113.0
13.7Net Efficiency5.8
7.8Strength of Schedule7.5
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
68.1Tempo69.8
51.6%Effective FG%53.1%
17.3%Turnover Rate14.5%
44.5%Offensive Rebound %36.5%
38.6%Free Throw Rate43.8%
9.3Average Margin4.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY51.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–64.4), defensive efficiency (102.1–113.0), net efficiency (13.7–5.8), strength of schedule (7.8–7.5).
Auburn COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.8–115.8), recent form (8.0–3.3), shooting efficiency (53.1–51.6).