High Point

31-5

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

27.3%High Point

72.7%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -4.4

PROJECTED TOTAL160.3

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -266

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHigh Point 78

Projected Total160.3

Projected ScorePurdue 82

Team Comparison

High PointMetricPurdue

69MMH Power Index73.2

123.8Offensive Efficiency124.8

98.3Defensive Efficiency107.8

25.5Net Efficiency17.0

-5.8Strength of Schedule7.6

16.5Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

72.4Tempo65.4

56.6%Effective FG%57.8%

12.8%Turnover Rate13.7%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

42.4%Free Throw Rate29.1%

18.5Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

High Point HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (98.3–107.8), net efficiency (25.5–17.0), recent form (16.5–11.8), ball security (12.8–13.7).

Purdue COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (73.2–69.0), offensive efficiency (124.8–123.8), strength of schedule (7.6–-5.8).

Final

High Point

63—75

Purdue

Purdue by 12 • 59.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

High PointTEAM STATPurdue

23-53FG28-61

43.0%FG%46.0%

10-283PT5-15

36.0%3PT%33.0%

7-11FT14-22

64.0%FT%64.0%

24Rebounds45

7Offensive Rebounds19

13Assists10

9Turnovers7

4Steals4

2Blocks—

20Fouls13

Player Box Score

High Point

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
D'Maurian Williams	Guard	24	5-9	2-3	0-0	0	3	0	0	12
Trae Benham	Guard	29	3-7	3-6	2-2	3	0	0	0	11
Juslin Bodo Bodo	C	29	4-5	0-0	0-1	6	1	0	2	8
Kezza Giffa	G	27	3-7	1-3	1-3	3	3	1	0	8
Abdoulaye Thiam	Guard	10	1-3	1-3	3-3	0	0	0	0	6
Bobby Pettiford	Guard	24	2-6	0-1	1-2	5	3	0	0	5
Chase Johnston	G	24	1-6	1-6	0-0	1	3	2	0	3
Simon Hildebrandt	F	8	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Terry Anderson	F	8	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Kimani Hamilton	F	16	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Josh Ibukunoluwa	F	1	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	29	10-16	0-0	1-5	8	0	0	21
Braden Smith	G	40	6-19	2-4	6-8	3	6	2	20
Camden Heide	F	31	4-6	2-4	1-2	10	0	0	11
Fletcher Loyer	G	34	1-4	0-1	6-6	1	2	0	8
Myles Colvin	G	18	2-7	0-3	0-0	2	2	1	4
Will Berg	C	11	2-2	0-0	0-1	2	0	0	4
Gicarri Harris	G	14	1-5	1-3	0-0	8	0	0	3
C.J. Cox	G	14	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	2
Caleb Furst	Forward	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

59.9Possessions59.9

105.2Offensive Efficiency125.2

125.2Defensive Efficiency105.2

-20.0Net Efficiency20.0

52.8%Effective FG%50.0%

54.1%True Shooting %52.5%

14.9%Turnover Rate11.8%

20.8%Free Throw Rate36.1%

52.8%3-Point Rate24.6%

1.44Assist / Turnover1.43

Game Summary

Purdue won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 59.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.