Yale

23-7

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

57.8%Yale

42.2%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADYale -0.8

PROJECTED TOTAL153.1

MODEL MONEYLINEYale -137

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreYale 77

Projected Total153.1

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 76

Team Comparison

YaleMetricTexas A&M

65.4MMH Power Index58

121.4Offensive Efficiency116.1

105.8Defensive Efficiency108.4

15.6Net Efficiency7.7

1.6Strength of Schedule4.8

8.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

64.5Tempo69.1

56.8%Effective FG%53.5%

13.9%Turnover Rate14.8%

33.3%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

34.4%Free Throw Rate37.5%

10.1Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Yale HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–58.0), offensive efficiency (121.4–116.1), defensive efficiency (105.8–108.4), net efficiency (15.6–7.7).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.8–1.6), free throw rate (37.5–34.4).

Final

Yale

71—80

Texas A&M

Texas A&M by 9 • 71.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

YaleTEAM STATTexas A&M

27-58FG31-60

47.0%FG%52.0%

8-213PT6-25

38.0%3PT%24.0%

9-14FT12-21

64.0%FT%57.0%

29Rebounds37

6Offensive Rebounds10

18Assists11

13Turnovers11

6Steals9

1Blocks4

21Fouls16

Player Box Score

Yale

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
John Poulakidas	Guard	38	7-18	4-10	5-5	3	1	1	0	23
Nick Townsend	F	37	7-13	1-3	0-3	4	4	3	0	15
Isaac Celiscar	F	24	5-6	0-1	2-2	3	2	0	0	12
Casey Simmons	G	32	5-9	1-3	0-0	5	1	1	0	11
Riley Fox	F	6	2-3	2-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Bez Mbeng	Guard	35	0-5	0-1	2-4	8	9	0	0	2
Samson Aletan	C	15	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	2
Trevor Mullin	G	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Jack Molloy	Forward	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jordan Brathwaite	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Pharrel Payne	F	25	10-12	0-0	5-6	10	1	0	0	25
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	29	6-13	1-6	3-6	1	5	2	0	16
Jace Carter	Not Available	9	4-6	2-4	0-1	4	0	1	1	10
Manny Obaseki	Guard	20	3-5	1-1	2-2	0	1	0	1	9
Andersson Garcia	Forward	32	2-6	1-3	2-6	8	3	1	1	7
Zhuric Phelps	Guard	25	2-6	1-4	0-0	3	1	1	0	5
Hayden Hefner	Guard	18	2-6	0-4	0-0	2	0	2	0	4
Solomon Washington	F	22	1-1	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	1	2
Henry Coleman III	Forward	14	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	2
CJ Wilcher	Guard	6	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.4Possessions71.4

99.4Offensive Efficiency112.0

112.0Defensive Efficiency99.4

-12.6Net Efficiency12.6

53.4%Effective FG%56.7%

54.9%True Shooting %57.2%

18.1%Turnover Rate15.5%

24.1%Free Throw Rate35.0%

36.2%3-Point Rate41.7%

1.38Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 71.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.