
Creighton
15-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.4%Creighton
88.6%Auburn
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAuburn -12.8
PROJECTED TOTAL159.7
MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -777

Auburn
21-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCreighton 73
Projected Total159.7
Projected ScoreAuburn 86
Team Comparison
50.6MMH Power Index64.4
109.0Offensive Efficiency118.8
109.5Defensive Efficiency113.0
-0.5Net Efficiency5.8
5.1Strength of Schedule7.5
-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
68.9Tempo69.8
53.0%Effective FG%53.1%
16.6%Turnover Rate14.5%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %36.5%
29.0%Free Throw Rate43.8%
-0.3Average Margin4.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Auburn HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY88.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAuburn holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.4–50.6), offensive efficiency (118.8–109.0), net efficiency (5.8–-0.5), strength of schedule (7.5–5.1).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.5–113.0).