
UCLA
24-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.4%UCLA
75.6%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -8.7
PROJECTED TOTAL149.9
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -310

Tennessee
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 71
Projected Total149.9
Projected ScoreTennessee 79
Team Comparison
63MMH Power Index68.6
115.9Offensive Efficiency115.8
106.9Defensive Efficiency102.1
9.0Net Efficiency13.7
5.1Strength of Schedule7.8
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
66.5Tempo68.1
53.5%Effective FG%51.6%
13.4%Turnover Rate17.3%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
33.8%Free Throw Rate38.6%
6.0Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–63.0), defensive efficiency (102.1–106.9), net efficiency (13.7–9.0), strength of schedule (7.8–5.1).
UCLA COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.9–115.8), recent form (8.0–3.3), shooting efficiency (53.5–51.6).