Samford

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

6.7%Samford

93.3%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -17.3

PROJECTED TOTAL156.1

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -1393

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSamford 69

Projected Total156.1

Projected ScorePurdue 87

Team Comparison

SamfordMetricPurdue

54.1MMH Power Index73.2

113.5Offensive Efficiency124.8

108.3Defensive Efficiency107.8

5.2Net Efficiency17.0

-2.9Strength of Schedule7.6

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

69.5Tempo65.4

54.0%Effective FG%57.8%

13.3%Turnover Rate13.7%

25.3%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

42.5%Free Throw Rate29.1%

3.6Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–54.1), offensive efficiency (124.8–113.5), defensive efficiency (107.8–108.3), net efficiency (17.0–5.2).

Samford COUNTERS WITHrecent form (14.0–11.8), ball security (13.3–13.7), free throw rate (42.5–29.1).

Final

Samford

45—98

Purdue

Purdue by 53 • 75.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SamfordTEAM STATPurdue

17-68FG34-62

25.0%FG%54.8%

5-313PT16-29

16.1%3PT%55.2%

6-14FT14-22

42.9%FT%63.6%

33Rebounds54

14Offensive Rebounds12

11Assists29

15Turnovers15

11Steals9

—Blocks10

19Fouls15

Player Box Score

Samford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jaden Campbell	Guard	22	4-9	2-5	1-2	3	1	0	11
Rylan Jones	Guard	19	3-8	1-4	1-2	1	2	1	8
Achor Achor	F	19	2-9	0-2	2-4	7	1	0	6
Dallas Graziani	Guard	22	1-3	0-1	2-2	1	2	2	4
Jermaine Marshall	Forward	14	1-5	1-4	0-0	0	1	1	3
Chandler Leopard	Guard	12	1-4	1-4	0-0	0	1	1	3
AJ Staton-McCray	G	19	1-8	0-2	0-0	5	0	1	2
Nathan Johnson	Forward	13	1-5	0-3	0-3	2	0	0	2
Josh Holloway	G	12	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2
Lukas Walls	G	11	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	2
Zach Loveday	Center	8	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	2
Garrett Hicks	Guard	20	0-7	0-4	0-1	5	2	3	0
Riley Allenspach	F	12	0-4	0-2	0-0	0	0	2	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Zach Edey	Center	20	5-6	0-0	6-10	11	2	0	4	16
Camden Heide	F	16	5-9	3-4	0-0	3	2	0	2	13
Braden Smith	G	22	4-7	4-5	0-0	4	7	1	0	12
Fletcher Loyer	G	17	4-7	4-6	0-0	2	1	1	0	12
Myles Colvin	G	16	3-8	2-5	0-0	0	0	0	1	8
William Berg	C	7	3-4	0-0	1-1	4	0	0	0	7
Lance Jones	Guard	20	3-9	0-4	0-1	3	3	2	0	6
Caleb Furst	Forward	13	2-2	1-1	1-2	4	1	0	0	6
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	15	1-2	1-1	2-2	5	3	1	1	5
Ethan Morton	Guard	15	1-2	1-1	2-2	1	5	4	0	5
Brian Waddell	F	9	2-3	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	4
Mason Gillis	Forward	17	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	3	0	0	2
Sam King	F	2	0-0	0-0	2-4	3	0	0	2	2
Chase Martin	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	2	0	0	0
Carson Barrett	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Josh Furst	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jace Rayl	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.6Possessions75.6

59.5Offensive Efficiency129.6

129.6Defensive Efficiency59.5

-70.1Net Efficiency70.1

28.7%Effective FG%67.7%

30.1%True Shooting %67.6%

19.8%Turnover Rate19.9%

20.6%Free Throw Rate35.5%

45.6%3-Point Rate46.8%

0.73Assist / Turnover1.93

Game Summary

Purdue won by 53 points. The game played at approximately 75.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.