
Stetson
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.8%Stetson
94.2%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -18.0
PROJECTED TOTAL147.8
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -1624

Clemson
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStetson 65
Projected Total147.8
Projected ScoreClemson 83
Team Comparison
40.9MMH Power Index59.9
106.3Offensive Efficiency111.9
111.8Defensive Efficiency103.9
-5.5Net Efficiency8.0
-1.9Strength of Schedule5.5
-5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
68.9Tempo66.3
52.4%Effective FG%52.2%
17.1%Turnover Rate16.0%
30.1%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
35.2%Free Throw Rate36.4%
-3.8Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Clemson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–40.9), offensive efficiency (111.9–106.3), defensive efficiency (103.9–111.8), net efficiency (8.0–-5.5).
Stetson COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.4–52.2), offensive rebounding (30.1–29.8).