UAB

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

22.9%UAB

77.1%McNeese

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMcNeese -7.9

PROJECTED TOTAL150.6

MODEL MONEYLINEMcNeese -337

McNeese

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 71

Projected Total150.6

Projected ScoreMcNeese 79

Team Comparison

UABMetricMcNeese

51.6MMH Power Index57.6

109.1Offensive Efficiency112.3

106.5Defensive Efficiency103.9

2.6Net Efficiency8.4

0.8Strength of Schedule0.0

2.6Last 10 Net Efficiency8.4

70.4Tempo67.5

51.2%Effective FG%52.0%

15.6%Turnover Rate16.0%

31.3%Offensive Rebound %32.4%

36.1%Free Throw Rate36.3%

1.8Average Margin5.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

McNeese HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMcNeese holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.6–51.6), offensive efficiency (112.3–109.1), defensive efficiency (103.9–106.5), net efficiency (8.4–2.6).

UAB COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.8–0.0), ball security (15.6–16.0).