Pepperdine

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

43.9%Pepperdine

56.1%Cornell

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCornell -1.6

PROJECTED TOTAL156.5

MODEL MONEYLINECornell -128

Cornell

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePepperdine 77

Projected Total156.5

Projected ScoreCornell 79

Team Comparison

PepperdineMetricCornell

49.8MMH Power Index44.9

109.4Offensive Efficiency110.4

107.0Defensive Efficiency110.9

2.4Net Efficiency-0.5

0.4Strength of Schedule-0.6

2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.6

69.5Tempo70.9

51.2%Effective FG%54.0%

17.1%Turnover Rate16.5%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %30.9%

35.3%Free Throw Rate34.3%

1.7Average Margin-0.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cornell HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPepperdine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–44.9), defensive efficiency (107.0–110.9), net efficiency (2.4–-0.5), strength of schedule (0.4–-0.6).

Cornell COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.4–109.4), shooting efficiency (54.0–51.2), ball security (16.5–17.1).