UT Martin logo

UT Martin

0-0
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.6%UT Martin
62.4%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulane -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL147.6
MODEL MONEYLINETulane -166
Tulane logo

Tulane

0-0
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 72
Projected Total147.6
Projected ScoreTulane 75

Team Comparison

46.4MMH Power Index45.7
107.1Offensive Efficiency106.9
104.6Defensive Efficiency109.1
2.5Net Efficiency-2.2
-4.0Strength of Schedule0.8
2.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
68.1Tempo68.9
51.4%Effective FG%51.4%
17.9%Turnover Rate16.4%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
36.2%Free Throw Rate38.0%
1.7Average Margin-1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tulane HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.4–45.7), offensive efficiency (107.1–106.9), defensive efficiency (104.6–109.1), net efficiency (2.5–-2.2).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.8–-4.0), ball security (16.4–17.9), free throw rate (38.0–36.2).