Hofstra

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

43.8%Hofstra

56.2%Princeton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPrinceton -1.6

PROJECTED TOTAL146.4

MODEL MONEYLINEPrinceton -128

Princeton

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 72

Projected Total146.4

Projected ScorePrinceton 74

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricPrinceton

57.3MMH Power Index52.4

112.2Offensive Efficiency110.8

103.8Defensive Efficiency105.3

8.4Net Efficiency5.5

-0.4Strength of Schedule-0.6

8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency5.5

67.6Tempo67.1

52.0%Effective FG%51.6%

16.5%Turnover Rate16.7%

31.8%Offensive Rebound %30.0%

34.8%Free Throw Rate35.6%

5.7Average Margin3.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Princeton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–52.4), offensive efficiency (112.2–110.8), defensive efficiency (103.8–105.3), net efficiency (8.4–5.5).

Princeton COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (35.6–34.8).