New Hampshire
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.3%New Hampshire
62.7%Rider
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRider -3.4
PROJECTED TOTAL147.9
MODEL MONEYLINERider -168
Rider
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 72
Projected Total147.9
Projected ScoreRider 76
Team Comparison
34.2MMH Power Index32.1
102.5Offensive Efficiency101.8
111.6Defensive Efficiency113.4
-9.1Net Efficiency-11.6
-3.7Strength of Schedule-2.2
-9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6
69.2Tempo67.5
50.9%Effective FG%49.8%
16.5%Turnover Rate16.8%
29.8%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
34.2%Free Throw Rate34.7%
-6.3Average Margin-7.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Rider HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNew Hampshire holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (34.2–32.1), offensive efficiency (102.5–101.8), defensive efficiency (111.6–113.4), net efficiency (-9.1–-11.6).
Rider COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.2–-3.7), offensive rebounding (31.3–29.8), free throw rate (34.7–34.2).