East Texas A&M
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.2%East Texas A&M
66.8%Rice
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRice -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL150.3
MODEL MONEYLINERice -201
Rice
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 73
Projected Total150.3
Projected ScoreRice 77
Team Comparison
44.9MMH Power Index45.6
106.3Offensive Efficiency107.2
108.2Defensive Efficiency109.5
-1.9Net Efficiency-2.3
0.0Strength of Schedule0.8
-1.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.3
69.2Tempo68.7
51.7%Effective FG%51.4%
17.2%Turnover Rate17.0%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %32.0%
34.8%Free Throw Rate35.5%
-1.3Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Rice HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.6–44.9), offensive efficiency (107.2–106.3), strength of schedule (0.8–0.0), ball security (17.0–17.2).
East Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.2–109.5), net efficiency (-1.9–-2.3), recent form (-1.9–-2.3).