Colgate

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

41.7%Colgate

58.3%Drexel

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADDrexel -2.2

PROJECTED TOTAL147.9

MODEL MONEYLINEDrexel -140

Drexel

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreColgate 73

Projected Total147.9

Projected ScoreDrexel 75

Team Comparison

ColgateMetricDrexel

47.8MMH Power Index43.4

109.5Offensive Efficiency105.5

107.9Defensive Efficiency108.3

1.6Net Efficiency-2.8

-2.9Strength of Schedule-0.4

1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.8

68.7Tempo67.4

52.6%Effective FG%51.8%

16.2%Turnover Rate17.3%

29.8%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

34.3%Free Throw Rate34.9%

1.1Average Margin-1.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Drexel HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–43.4), offensive efficiency (109.5–105.5), defensive efficiency (107.9–108.3), net efficiency (1.6–-2.8).

Drexel COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.4–-2.9), offensive rebounding (30.8–29.8), free throw rate (34.9–34.3).