Prairie View A&M logo

Prairie View A&M

0-0
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.9%Prairie View A&M
89.1%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -13.6
PROJECTED TOTAL152.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -817
UT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley

0-0
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePrairie View A&M 69
Projected Total152.4
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 83

Team Comparison

40.1MMH Power Index52.7
104.9Offensive Efficiency110.3
109.7Defensive Efficiency105.9
-4.8Net Efficiency4.4
-5.1Strength of Schedule0.0
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
71.4Tempo68.2
51.3%Effective FG%52.9%
16.5%Turnover Rate17.0%
30.0%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
37.6%Free Throw Rate34.2%
-3.4Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–40.1), offensive efficiency (110.3–104.9), defensive efficiency (105.9–109.7), net efficiency (4.4–-4.8).
Prairie View A&M COUNTERS WITHball security (16.5–17.0), free throw rate (37.6–34.2).