Incarnate Word
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.9%Incarnate Word
56.1%UTEP
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUTEP -1.6
PROJECTED TOTAL148.5
MODEL MONEYLINEUTEP -128
UTEP
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 73
Projected Total148.5
Projected ScoreUTEP 75
Team Comparison
47.6MMH Power Index43.7
109.2Offensive Efficiency105.3
108.9Defensive Efficiency109.4
0.3Net Efficiency-4.1
0.0Strength of Schedule1.8
0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.2
67.7Tempo68.3
52.0%Effective FG%51.3%
16.7%Turnover Rate16.8%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.0%
35.3%Free Throw Rate35.7%
0.2Average Margin-2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UTEP HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIncarnate Word holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.6–43.7), offensive efficiency (109.2–105.3), defensive efficiency (108.9–109.4), net efficiency (0.3–-4.1).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.8–0.0), free throw rate (35.7–35.3).