Florida A&M
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.9%Florida A&M
88.1%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL152.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -740
UAB
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 70
Projected Total152.4
Projected ScoreUAB 83
Team Comparison
40.6MMH Power Index51.6
104.5Offensive Efficiency109.1
108.8Defensive Efficiency106.5
-4.3Net Efficiency2.6
-5.1Strength of Schedule0.8
-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.6
69.8Tempo70.4
51.3%Effective FG%51.2%
17.9%Turnover Rate15.6%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
36.3%Free Throw Rate36.1%
-3.0Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY88.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.6–40.6), offensive efficiency (109.1–104.5), defensive efficiency (106.5–108.8), net efficiency (2.6–-4.3).
Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.3–51.2), free throw rate (36.3–36.1).