Cleveland State

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.1%Cleveland State

78.9%Bowling Green

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBowling Green -8.5

PROJECTED TOTAL156.2

MODEL MONEYLINEBowling Green -374

Bowling Green

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCleveland State 74

Projected Total156.2

Projected ScoreBowling Green 82

Team Comparison

Cleveland StateMetricBowling Green

39.2MMH Power Index45

107.1Offensive Efficiency107.2

113.1Defensive Efficiency108.0

-6.0Net Efficiency-0.8

-1.9Strength of Schedule-0.9

-6.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.8

70.3Tempo70.6

52.7%Effective FG%52.3%

17.0%Turnover Rate16.5%

30.2%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

36.5%Free Throw Rate36.5%

-4.2Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Bowling Green HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBowling Green holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.0–39.2), offensive efficiency (107.2–107.1), defensive efficiency (108.0–113.1), net efficiency (-0.8–-6.0).

Cleveland State COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.7–52.3).