Queens University

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

19.7%Queens University

80.3%BYU

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBYU -9.1

PROJECTED TOTAL156.9

MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -408

BYU

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQueens University 74

Projected Total156.9

Projected ScoreBYU 83

Team Comparison

Queens UniversityMetricBYU

50.3MMH Power Index56.3

111.6Offensive Efficiency113.0

109.5Defensive Efficiency105.6

2.1Net Efficiency7.4

-1.9Strength of Schedule0.0

2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4

70.2Tempo69.8

53.1%Effective FG%52.7%

16.2%Turnover Rate16.3%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %31.5%

36.2%Free Throw Rate35.7%

1.4Average Margin5.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

BYU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.3–50.3), offensive efficiency (113.0–111.6), defensive efficiency (105.6–109.5), net efficiency (7.4–2.1).

Queens University COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.1–52.7), ball security (16.2–16.3), free throw rate (36.2–35.7).