
Harvard
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.2%Harvard
44.8%Northeastern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHarvard -1.4
PROJECTED TOTAL149.1
MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -123

Northeastern
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 75
Projected Total149.1
Projected ScoreNortheastern 74
Team Comparison
55MMH Power Index46.4
111.3Offensive Efficiency108.8
103.7Defensive Efficiency109.2
7.6Net Efficiency-0.4
-0.6Strength of Schedule-0.4
7.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
66.9Tempo69.5
52.3%Effective FG%52.2%
16.8%Turnover Rate16.6%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
33.8%Free Throw Rate34.3%
5.1Average Margin-0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Harvard HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY55.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.0–46.4), offensive efficiency (111.3–108.8), defensive efficiency (103.7–109.2), net efficiency (7.6–-0.4).
Northeastern COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.4–-0.6), ball security (16.6–16.8), offensive rebounding (29.8–29.7).