Texas State
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.4%Texas State
70.6%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -5.7
PROJECTED TOTAL149.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -240
UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas State 72
Projected Total149.2
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 77
Team Comparison
49.8MMH Power Index52.7
108.6Offensive Efficiency110.3
106.5Defensive Efficiency105.9
2.1Net Efficiency4.4
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
68.8Tempo68.2
51.8%Effective FG%52.9%
17.1%Turnover Rate17.0%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
35.8%Free Throw Rate34.2%
1.4Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–49.8), offensive efficiency (110.3–108.6), defensive efficiency (105.9–106.5), net efficiency (4.4–2.1).
Texas State COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.7–30.4), free throw rate (35.8–34.2).