Georgetown

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.8%Georgetown

81.2%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -9.5

PROJECTED TOTAL142.3

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -432

Clemson

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGeorgetown 66

Projected Total142.3

Projected ScoreClemson 76

Team Comparison

GeorgetownMetricClemson

51.7MMH Power Index59.9

108.6Offensive Efficiency111.9

107.4Defensive Efficiency103.9

1.2Net Efficiency8.0

4.4Strength of Schedule5.5

1.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0

65.4Tempo66.3

51.3%Effective FG%52.2%

16.6%Turnover Rate16.0%

31.2%Offensive Rebound %29.8%

36.4%Free Throw Rate36.4%

0.8Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–51.7), offensive efficiency (111.9–108.6), defensive efficiency (103.9–107.4), net efficiency (8.0–1.2).

Georgetown COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.2–29.8).