UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.8%UT Rio Grande Valley
47.2%UT Arlington
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -0.7
PROJECTED TOTAL147.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -112
UT Arlington
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 75
Projected Total147.8
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 74
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index44.9
110.3Offensive Efficiency105.8
105.9Defensive Efficiency106.6
4.4Net Efficiency-0.8
0.0Strength of Schedule-2.1
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.8
68.2Tempo68.6
52.9%Effective FG%51.1%
17.0%Turnover Rate17.6%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
34.2%Free Throw Rate37.8%
3.0Average Margin-0.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–44.9), offensive efficiency (110.3–105.8), defensive efficiency (105.9–106.6), net efficiency (4.4–-0.8).
UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.1–30.4), free throw rate (37.8–34.2).