Florida A&M
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.1%Florida A&M
77.9%UTEP
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUTEP -8.1
PROJECTED TOTAL149.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUTEP -352
UTEP
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 71
Projected Total149.2
Projected ScoreUTEP 79
Team Comparison
40.6MMH Power Index43.7
104.5Offensive Efficiency105.3
108.8Defensive Efficiency109.4
-4.3Net Efficiency-4.1
-5.1Strength of Schedule1.8
-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.2
69.8Tempo68.3
51.3%Effective FG%51.3%
17.9%Turnover Rate16.8%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %30.0%
36.3%Free Throw Rate35.7%
-3.0Average Margin-2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UTEP HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUTEP holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (43.7–40.6), offensive efficiency (105.3–104.5), net efficiency (-4.1–-4.3), strength of schedule (1.8–-5.1).
Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.8–109.4), offensive rebounding (30.7–30.0), free throw rate (36.3–35.7).