Colgate

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

25.8%Colgate

74.2%Delaware

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADDelaware -6.9

PROJECTED TOTAL148.8

MODEL MONEYLINEDelaware -288

Delaware

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreColgate 71

Projected Total148.8

Projected ScoreDelaware 78

Team Comparison

ColgateMetricDelaware

47.8MMH Power Index51.3

109.5Offensive Efficiency110.3

107.9Defensive Efficiency106.0

1.6Net Efficiency4.3

-2.9Strength of Schedule-0.5

1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency4.2

68.7Tempo67.3

52.6%Effective FG%52.2%

16.2%Turnover Rate17.1%

29.8%Offensive Rebound %28.2%

34.3%Free Throw Rate34.6%

1.1Average Margin2.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Delaware HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDelaware holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.3–47.8), offensive efficiency (110.3–109.5), defensive efficiency (106.0–107.9), net efficiency (4.3–1.6).

Colgate COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.6–52.2), ball security (16.2–17.1), offensive rebounding (29.8–28.2).