Kansas

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

38.2%Kansas

61.8%UNLV

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUNLV -3.1

PROJECTED TOTAL152.3

MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -162

UNLV

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreKansas 75

Projected Total152.3

Projected ScoreUNLV 78

Team Comparison

KansasMetricUNLV

55.5MMH Power Index53.6

110.7Offensive Efficiency110.6

104.0Defensive Efficiency106.8

6.7Net Efficiency3.8

0.0Strength of Schedule1.8

6.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.8

68.9Tempo70.2

51.8%Effective FG%52.4%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.8%

30.3%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

35.1%Free Throw Rate37.2%

4.6Average Margin2.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UNLV HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKansas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.5–53.6), offensive efficiency (110.7–110.6), defensive efficiency (104.0–106.8), net efficiency (6.7–3.8).

UNLV COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.8–0.0), shooting efficiency (52.4–51.8), offensive rebounding (30.8–30.3).