UCF

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

24.3%UCF

75.7%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -7.3

PROJECTED TOTAL155.8

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -312

Vanderbilt

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUCF 74

Projected Total155.8

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 82

Team Comparison

UCFMetricVanderbilt

53.3MMH Power Index58.6

111.5Offensive Efficiency114.0

106.6Defensive Efficiency104.9

4.9Net Efficiency9.1

0.0Strength of Schedule0.0

4.9Last 10 Net Efficiency9.2

70.1Tempo70.0

52.2%Effective FG%52.8%

16.5%Turnover Rate15.9%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

34.6%Free Throw Rate36.7%

3.4Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.6–53.3), offensive efficiency (114.0–111.5), defensive efficiency (104.9–106.6), net efficiency (9.1–4.9).

UCF COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.7–30.8).