George Washington
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.9%George Washington
58.1%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -2.1
PROJECTED TOTAL154.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -139
UAB
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGeorge Washington 76
Projected Total154.2
Projected ScoreUAB 78
Team Comparison
53MMH Power Index51.6
110.9Offensive Efficiency109.1
106.5Defensive Efficiency106.5
4.4Net Efficiency2.6
2.2Strength of Schedule0.8
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.6
69.8Tempo70.4
52.7%Effective FG%51.2%
17.1%Turnover Rate15.6%
32.0%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
35.7%Free Throw Rate36.1%
3.1Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGeorge Washington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.0–51.6), offensive efficiency (110.9–109.1), net efficiency (4.4–2.6), strength of schedule (2.2–0.8).
UAB COUNTERS WITHball security (15.6–17.1), free throw rate (36.1–35.7).