Queens University
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.7%Queens University
73.3%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLSU -6.5
PROJECTED TOTAL157.0
MODEL MONEYLINELSU -275
LSU
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 75
Projected Total157.0
Projected ScoreLSU 82
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index52
111.6Offensive Efficiency111.4
109.5Defensive Efficiency107.6
2.1Net Efficiency3.8
-1.9Strength of Schedule0.0
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency3.8
70.2Tempo69.8
53.1%Effective FG%52.3%
16.2%Turnover Rate16.4%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
36.2%Free Throw Rate37.3%
1.4Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
LSU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLSU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.0–50.3), defensive efficiency (107.6–109.5), net efficiency (3.8–2.1), strength of schedule (0.0–-1.9).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.6–111.4), shooting efficiency (53.1–52.3), ball security (16.2–16.4).