UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.5%UT Rio Grande Valley
64.5%Austin Peay
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAustin Peay -3.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.5
MODEL MONEYLINEAustin Peay -182
Austin Peay
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74
Projected Total151.5
Projected ScoreAustin Peay 78
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index52.4
110.3Offensive Efficiency111.0
105.9Defensive Efficiency105.8
4.4Net Efficiency5.2
0.0Strength of Schedule-2.1
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency5.3
68.2Tempo70.0
52.9%Effective FG%52.5%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.3%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
34.2%Free Throw Rate36.6%
3.0Average Margin3.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Austin Peay HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAustin Peay holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (111.0–110.3), defensive efficiency (105.8–105.9), net efficiency (5.2–4.4), recent form (5.3–4.4).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (52.7–52.4), strength of schedule (0.0–-2.1), shooting efficiency (52.9–52.5).