Northeastern

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

55.2%Northeastern

44.8%Stonehill

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNortheastern -1.3

PROJECTED TOTAL150.0

MODEL MONEYLINENortheastern -123

Stonehill

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNortheastern 76

Projected Total150.0

Projected ScoreStonehill 74

Team Comparison

NortheasternMetricStonehill

46.4MMH Power Index38.7

108.8Offensive Efficiency103.7

109.2Defensive Efficiency108.1

-0.4Net Efficiency-4.4

-0.4Strength of Schedule-4.6

-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.4

69.5Tempo68.6

52.2%Effective FG%51.0%

16.6%Turnover Rate17.3%

29.8%Offensive Rebound %30.2%

34.3%Free Throw Rate34.1%

-0.2Average Margin-3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Northeastern HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNortheastern holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.4–38.7), offensive efficiency (108.8–103.7), net efficiency (-0.4–-4.4), strength of schedule (-0.4–-4.6).

Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.1–109.2), offensive rebounding (30.2–29.8).