UMass Lowell
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.7%UMass Lowell
90.3%Cincinnati
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -14.4
PROJECTED TOTAL150.3
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -931
Cincinnati
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUMass Lowell 68
Projected Total150.3
Projected ScoreCincinnati 82
Team Comparison
39.1MMH Power Index55.3
105.8Offensive Efficiency109.7
110.9Defensive Efficiency103.2
-5.1Net Efficiency6.5
-3.7Strength of Schedule0.0
-5.1Last 10 Net Efficiency6.5
69.2Tempo69.2
51.7%Effective FG%51.6%
16.9%Turnover Rate16.8%
31.9%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
36.3%Free Throw Rate34.5%
-3.5Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.3–39.1), offensive efficiency (109.7–105.8), defensive efficiency (103.2–110.9), net efficiency (6.5–-5.1).
UMass Lowell COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.7–51.6), offensive rebounding (31.9–30.7), free throw rate (36.3–34.5).