UNC Greensboro
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.7%UNC Greensboro
91.3%Pepperdine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPepperdine -15.2
PROJECTED TOTAL153.6
MODEL MONEYLINEPepperdine -1049
Pepperdine
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNC Greensboro 69
Projected Total153.6
Projected ScorePepperdine 84
Team Comparison
32.8MMH Power Index49.8
104.3Offensive Efficiency109.4
114.9Defensive Efficiency107.0
-10.6Net Efficiency2.4
-2.9Strength of Schedule0.4
-10.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.4
69.4Tempo69.5
52.2%Effective FG%51.2%
16.2%Turnover Rate17.1%
30.3%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
37.3%Free Throw Rate35.3%
-7.3Average Margin1.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pepperdine HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY91.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPepperdine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–32.8), offensive efficiency (109.4–104.3), defensive efficiency (107.0–114.9), net efficiency (2.4–-10.6).
UNC Greensboro COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.2–51.2), ball security (16.2–17.1), free throw rate (37.3–35.3).