Charleston

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

56.6%Charleston

43.4%UTEP

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCharleston -1.7

PROJECTED TOTAL149.5

MODEL MONEYLINECharleston -130

UTEP

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCharleston 76

Projected Total149.5

Projected ScoreUTEP 74

Team Comparison

CharlestonMetricUTEP

53.2MMH Power Index43.7

110.6Offensive Efficiency105.3

105.5Defensive Efficiency109.4

5.1Net Efficiency-4.1

-0.4Strength of Schedule1.8

5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.2

69.1Tempo68.3

51.6%Effective FG%51.3%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.8%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %30.0%

37.4%Free Throw Rate35.7%

3.6Average Margin-2.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Charleston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCharleston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.2–43.7), offensive efficiency (110.6–105.3), defensive efficiency (105.5–109.4), net efficiency (5.1–-4.1).

UTEP COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.8–-0.4).