
SMU
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
56.2%SMU
43.8%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -1.6
PROJECTED TOTAL156.1
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -128

LSU
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 79
Projected Total156.1
Projected ScoreLSU 77
Team Comparison
59.1MMH Power Index52
113.3Offensive Efficiency111.4
105.9Defensive Efficiency107.6
7.4Net Efficiency3.8
5.5Strength of Schedule0.0
7.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.8
70.1Tempo69.8
52.9%Effective FG%52.3%
16.4%Turnover Rate16.4%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
34.7%Free Throw Rate37.3%
5.2Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–52.0), offensive efficiency (113.3–111.4), defensive efficiency (105.9–107.6), net efficiency (7.4–3.8).
LSU COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (37.3–34.7).