Merrimack
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.0%Merrimack
78.0%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL145.3
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -355
Hofstra
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 69
Projected Total145.3
Projected ScoreHofstra 77
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index57.3
109.6Offensive Efficiency112.2
105.1Defensive Efficiency103.8
4.5Net Efficiency8.4
-2.2Strength of Schedule-0.4
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency8.5
66.7Tempo67.6
51.3%Effective FG%52.0%
16.2%Turnover Rate16.5%
29.3%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
36.7%Free Throw Rate34.8%
3.0Average Margin5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–51.9), offensive efficiency (112.2–109.6), defensive efficiency (103.8–105.1), net efficiency (8.4–4.5).
Merrimack COUNTERS WITHball security (16.2–16.5), free throw rate (36.7–34.8).