UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.0%UT Rio Grande Valley
68.0%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -4.9
PROJECTED TOTAL152.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -212
UNLV
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74
Projected Total152.0
Projected ScoreUNLV 78
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index53.6
110.3Offensive Efficiency110.6
105.9Defensive Efficiency106.8
4.4Net Efficiency3.8
0.0Strength of Schedule1.8
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.8
68.2Tempo70.2
52.9%Effective FG%52.4%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.8%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
34.2%Free Throw Rate37.2%
3.0Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.6–52.7), offensive efficiency (110.6–110.3), strength of schedule (1.8–0.0), ball security (16.8–17.0).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.9–106.8), net efficiency (4.4–3.8), recent form (4.4–3.8).