Queens University
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.2%Queens University
86.8%Houston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHouston -12.2
PROJECTED TOTAL152.0
MODEL MONEYLINEHouston -658
Houston
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 70
Projected Total152.0
Projected ScoreHouston 82
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index61.8
111.6Offensive Efficiency113.8
109.5Defensive Efficiency102.0
2.1Net Efficiency11.8
-1.9Strength of Schedule0.0
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8
70.2Tempo67.1
53.1%Effective FG%52.1%
16.2%Turnover Rate15.7%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %31.9%
36.2%Free Throw Rate33.6%
1.4Average Margin7.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Houston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHouston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.8–50.3), offensive efficiency (113.8–111.6), defensive efficiency (102.0–109.5), net efficiency (11.8–2.1).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.1–52.1), free throw rate (36.2–33.6).