Merrimack

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

43.2%Merrimack

56.8%Colgate

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADColgate -1.8

PROJECTED TOTAL147.4

MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -131

Colgate

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMerrimack 73

Projected Total147.4

Projected ScoreColgate 75

Team Comparison

MerrimackMetricColgate

51.9MMH Power Index47.8

109.6Offensive Efficiency109.5

105.1Defensive Efficiency107.9

4.5Net Efficiency1.6

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.9

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency1.6

66.7Tempo68.7

51.3%Effective FG%52.6%

16.2%Turnover Rate16.2%

29.3%Offensive Rebound %29.8%

36.7%Free Throw Rate34.3%

3.0Average Margin1.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Colgate HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–47.8), offensive efficiency (109.6–109.5), defensive efficiency (105.1–107.9), net efficiency (4.5–1.6).

Colgate COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.6–51.3), offensive rebounding (29.8–29.3).