Bowling Green
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.4%Bowling Green
81.6%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -9.7
PROJECTED TOTAL156.7
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -443
Kent State
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBowling Green 74
Projected Total156.7
Projected ScoreKent State 83
Team Comparison
45MMH Power Index54
107.2Offensive Efficiency112.1
108.0Defensive Efficiency105.6
-0.8Net Efficiency6.5
-0.9Strength of Schedule-0.9
-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency6.5
70.6Tempo71.5
52.3%Effective FG%52.2%
16.5%Turnover Rate16.9%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
36.5%Free Throw Rate37.7%
-0.6Average Margin4.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.0–45.0), offensive efficiency (112.1–107.2), defensive efficiency (105.6–108.0), net efficiency (6.5–-0.8).
Bowling Green COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.3–52.2), ball security (16.5–16.9).