UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
46.5%UT Rio Grande Valley
53.5%Nicholls
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNicholls -0.9
PROJECTED TOTAL149.6
MODEL MONEYLINENicholls -115
Nicholls
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74
Projected Total149.6
Projected ScoreNicholls 75
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index47.2
110.3Offensive Efficiency107.9
105.9Defensive Efficiency107.9
4.4Net Efficiency0.0
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency0.0
68.2Tempo68.9
52.9%Effective FG%51.7%
17.0%Turnover Rate16.8%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %30.2%
34.2%Free Throw Rate35.7%
3.0Average Margin0.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Nicholls HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY53.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–47.2), offensive efficiency (110.3–107.9), defensive efficiency (105.9–107.9), net efficiency (4.4–0.0).
Nicholls COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–17.0), free throw rate (35.7–34.2).