Merrimack
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.1%Merrimack
60.9%Siena
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSiena -2.9
PROJECTED TOTAL143.8
MODEL MONEYLINESiena -156
Siena
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 70
Projected Total143.8
Projected ScoreSiena 73
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index49.6
109.6Offensive Efficiency108.9
105.1Defensive Efficiency106.3
4.5Net Efficiency2.6
-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.6
66.7Tempo66.7
51.3%Effective FG%51.7%
16.2%Turnover Rate16.5%
29.3%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
36.7%Free Throw Rate35.6%
3.0Average Margin1.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Siena HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–49.6), offensive efficiency (109.6–108.9), defensive efficiency (105.1–106.3), net efficiency (4.5–2.6).
Siena COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.7–51.3), offensive rebounding (30.9–29.3).