
Hofstra
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
45.6%Hofstra
54.4%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLSU -1.2
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINELSU -119

LSU
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 75
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScoreLSU 76
Team Comparison
57.3MMH Power Index52
112.2Offensive Efficiency111.4
103.8Defensive Efficiency107.6
8.4Net Efficiency3.8
-0.4Strength of Schedule0.0
8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.8
67.6Tempo69.8
52.0%Effective FG%52.3%
16.5%Turnover Rate16.4%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
34.8%Free Throw Rate37.3%
5.7Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
LSU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY54.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.3–52.0), offensive efficiency (112.2–111.4), defensive efficiency (103.8–107.6), net efficiency (8.4–3.8).
LSU COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.0–-0.4), shooting efficiency (52.3–52.0), ball security (16.4–16.5).