Queens University
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
72.8%Queens University
27.2%Gardner-Webb
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -6.4
PROJECTED TOTAL156.2
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -268
Gardner-Webb
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 81
Projected Total156.2
Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 75
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index30.9
111.6Offensive Efficiency102.8
109.5Defensive Efficiency113.6
2.1Net Efficiency-10.8
-1.9Strength of Schedule-2.9
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.8
70.2Tempo70.0
53.1%Effective FG%51.2%
16.2%Turnover Rate17.3%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %29.0%
36.2%Free Throw Rate34.7%
1.4Average Margin-7.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–30.9), offensive efficiency (111.6–102.8), defensive efficiency (109.5–113.6), net efficiency (2.1–-10.8).