Bethune-Cookman
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.1%Bethune-Cookman
81.9%Marshall
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMarshall -9.8
PROJECTED TOTAL154.8
MODEL MONEYLINEMarshall -452
Marshall
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 73
Projected Total154.8
Projected ScoreMarshall 82
Team Comparison
43.1MMH Power Index49.9
106.4Offensive Efficiency110.5
108.7Defensive Efficiency108.1
-2.3Net Efficiency2.4
-5.1Strength of Schedule-1.4
-2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.4
70.5Tempo69.9
52.0%Effective FG%52.8%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.6%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
37.3%Free Throw Rate34.3%
-1.6Average Margin1.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Marshall HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMarshall holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.9–43.1), offensive efficiency (110.5–106.4), defensive efficiency (108.1–108.7), net efficiency (2.4–-2.3).
Bethune-Cookman COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (37.3–34.3).