Fairfield

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

31.2%Fairfield

68.8%Merrimack

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -5.1

PROJECTED TOTAL146.4

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -221

Merrimack

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFairfield 71

Projected Total146.4

Projected ScoreMerrimack 76

Team Comparison

FairfieldMetricMerrimack

49.7MMH Power Index51.9

109.3Offensive Efficiency109.6

106.7Defensive Efficiency105.1

2.6Net Efficiency4.5

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4

68.4Tempo66.7

51.3%Effective FG%51.3%

16.3%Turnover Rate16.2%

32.1%Offensive Rebound %29.3%

33.9%Free Throw Rate36.7%

1.8Average Margin3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–49.7), offensive efficiency (109.6–109.3), defensive efficiency (105.1–106.7), net efficiency (4.5–2.6).

Fairfield COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.1–29.3).