
Siena
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.9%Siena
70.1%Quinnipiac
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL147.8
MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -234

Quinnipiac
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSiena 71
Projected Total147.8
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 77
Team Comparison
49.6MMH Power Index51.8
108.9Offensive Efficiency109.4
106.3Defensive Efficiency105.1
2.6Net Efficiency4.3
-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.2
2.6Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
66.7Tempo69.8
51.7%Effective FG%51.2%
16.5%Turnover Rate16.4%
30.9%Offensive Rebound %31.6%
35.6%Free Throw Rate35.4%
1.7Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.8–49.6), offensive efficiency (109.4–108.9), defensive efficiency (105.1–106.3), net efficiency (4.3–2.6).
Siena COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.7–51.2), free throw rate (35.6–35.4).