Vanderbilt

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

46.1%Vanderbilt

53.9%California

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCalifornia -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL154.3

MODEL MONEYLINECalifornia -117

California

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 77

Projected Total154.3

Projected ScoreCalifornia 78

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricCalifornia

58.6MMH Power Index51.5

114.0Offensive Efficiency108.8

104.9Defensive Efficiency107.6

9.1Net Efficiency1.2

0.0Strength of Schedule5.5

9.2Last 10 Net Efficiency1.2

70.0Tempo69.5

52.8%Effective FG%52.1%

15.9%Turnover Rate16.2%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %29.7%

36.7%Free Throw Rate36.0%

6.4Average Margin0.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

California HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.6–51.5), offensive efficiency (114.0–108.8), defensive efficiency (104.9–107.6), net efficiency (9.1–1.2).

California COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–0.0).