UT Rio Grande Valley
0-0GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.4%UT Rio Grande Valley
59.6%Texas State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas State -2.5
PROJECTED TOTAL149.2
MODEL MONEYLINETexas State -148
Texas State
0-0MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 73
Projected Total149.2
Projected ScoreTexas State 76
Team Comparison
52.7MMH Power Index49.8
110.3Offensive Efficiency108.6
105.9Defensive Efficiency106.5
4.4Net Efficiency2.1
0.0Strength of Schedule0.0
4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
68.2Tempo68.8
52.9%Effective FG%51.8%
17.0%Turnover Rate17.1%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
34.2%Free Throw Rate35.8%
3.0Average Margin1.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Texas State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.7–49.8), offensive efficiency (110.3–108.6), defensive efficiency (105.9–106.5), net efficiency (4.4–2.1).
Texas State COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.7–30.4), free throw rate (35.8–34.2).