Colgate

0-0

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.2%Colgate

87.8%Syracuse

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSyracuse -12.8

PROJECTED TOTAL151.1

MODEL MONEYLINESyracuse -720

Syracuse

0-0

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreColgate 69

Projected Total151.1

Projected ScoreSyracuse 82

Team Comparison

ColgateMetricSyracuse

47.8MMH Power Index58.7

109.5Offensive Efficiency111.6

107.9Defensive Efficiency104.6

1.6Net Efficiency7.0

-2.9Strength of Schedule5.5

1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency7.0

68.7Tempo69.0

52.6%Effective FG%52.2%

16.2%Turnover Rate16.4%

29.8%Offensive Rebound %30.3%

34.3%Free Throw Rate35.9%

1.1Average Margin4.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Syracuse HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSyracuse holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.7–47.8), offensive efficiency (111.6–109.5), defensive efficiency (104.6–107.9), net efficiency (7.0–1.6).

Colgate COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.6–52.2), ball security (16.2–16.4).